Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 3 authors, 2021-12-01

Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Add compatible for AM64

From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-11-25 12:20:57
Also in: linux-omap, lkml


On 23/11/2021 21:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/11/2021 11:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
quoted
AM64 SoC contains the GPMC module. Add compatible for it.

Newer SoCs don't necessarily map GPMC data region at the same place
as legacy SoCs. Add reg-names "data", to provide this information to
the device driver.

Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
---
 .../bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml         | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml
index 25b42d68f9b3..1869cc6f949b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml
@@ -23,13 +23,20 @@ properties:
     items:
       - enum:
           - ti,am3352-gpmc
+          - ti,am64-gpmc
           - ti,omap2420-gpmc
           - ti,omap2430-gpmc
           - ti,omap3430-gpmc
           - ti,omap4430-gpmc
 
   reg:
-    maxItems: 1
+    minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 2
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: cfg
+      - const: data
I see your driver handles cases with only one reg item, but I have other
The support for these two items is added in patch 3 of this series "memory: omap-gpmc: Add support for GPMC on AM64 SoC"
question - is it correct to have older (ARMv7) platform with two reg
items? Or can am64-gpmc come with only one reg?
Older platforms currently have only one reg, but they can be updated to come with two without breaking functionality.
am64-gpmc cannot come with one reg as the defaults for data window are not suitable for AM64.

All legacy platforms were using a fixed Data IO window (first 1 GB) but from AM64 this was moved elsewhere, so the need for this change.
IOW, I am surprised there is no if-else case precising this minItems
requirement for different SocS.
OK. I will add this.
quoted
 
   interrupts:
     maxItems: 1
@@ -44,6 +51,9 @@ properties:
     items:
       - const: fck
 
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 1
Similar, but looks like a weaker requirement - could an older SoC define
power-domain?
No. Will add SoC specific constraint for this as well.
quoted
+
   dmas:
     items:
       - description: DMA channel for GPMC NAND prefetch

Best regards,
Krzysztof
cheers,
-roger
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help