Hi Guenter,
	This is my second submitting. I also refer to the format in others' emails.
	If the format is not correct, I will drop --in-reply-to when submit pathch next time.

Best Regards,
Xiantao

-----Original Message-----
From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:groeck7@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 10:18 PM
To: xt.hu[胡先韬] <xt.hu@cqplus1.com>
Cc: wim@linux-watchdog.org; p.zabel@pengutronix.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org; robh+dt@kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Wells Lu 呂芳騰
[off-list ref]; qinjian[覃健] [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add watchdog driver for Sunplus SP7021 SoC

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 06:41:47PM +0800, Xiantao Hu wrote:

quoted

This is a patch series for watchdog driver for Sunplus SP7021 SoC.

Sunplus SP7021 is an ARM Cortex A7 (4 cores) based SoC. It integrates
many peripherals (ex: UART, I2C, SPI, SDIO, eMMC, USB, SD card and
etc.) into a single chip. It is designed for industrial control.

Why are more and more people sending patches or patch series as reply to
previous patches ? This all by ensures that patches get lost.

Is that promoted somewhere ?

Thanks,
Guenter