Re: [PATCH V5] dt-bindings: soc: imx: Add binding doc for spba bus

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:36:59AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:11 PM Adam Ford [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:19 PM Adam Ford [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:04:14 -0600, Adam Ford wrote:

quoted

Add binding doc for fsl,spba-bus.

Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <redacted>
---
make dt_binding_check -j8 |grep spba
  DTEX    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dts
  DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dt.yaml
  CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/fsl,spba-bus.example.dt.yaml

V5:  Rebase on 5.10-rc2 to be able to check yaml
     Add Reg entry

V4:  Remove an accidental makefile change
     Move type:object under additional properties

V3:  Rebase sample from aips-bus example
     Split off from series adding i.MX8M Nano functions to reduce noise

V2:  Attempted to update yaml from feedback

Applied, thanks!

Rob,

I am not seeing this anywhere.  Can you tell me where this was
applied?  It's not appearing in Linux-next

Rob,

Patchwork shows this has been accepted [1], however I don't see that
it's still applied.


[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20201118230414.121316-1-aford173@gmail.com/

Can you apply it?  It looks like building the device tree is throwing
messages because this is missing.

Shawn,

Since you're the maintainer for the IMX stuff, can I update the
MAINTAINERS file to add this yaml file under the IMX section?  When
building device trees, it throws a bunch of splat because this patch
was never applied, and checkpatch is showing it wants a maintainer.

checkpatch warning on maintainer shouldn't be a problem.  We don't
really want to bloat IMX entry in MAINTAINERS.

Shawn