Re: [PATCH 3/3] devicetree: bindings: pinctrl: Add bindings doc for Sunplus SP7021.
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-09 04:00:04
Also in:
linux-gpio, lkml
Hi Wells Lu, thanks for your patch! On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:55 AM Wells Lu [off-list ref] wrote:
+ properties: + pins: + description: | + Define pins which are used by pinctrl node's client device. + + It consists of one or more integers which represents the config + setting for corresponding pin. Please use macro SPPCTL_IOPAD to + define the integers for pins. + + The first argument of the macro is pin number, the second is pin + type, the third is type of GPIO, the last is default output state + of GPIO. + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array + + function: + description: | + Define pin-function which is used by pinctrl node's client device. + The name should be one of string in the following enumeration. + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string" + enum: [ SPI_FLASH, SPI_FLASH_4BIT, SPI_NAND, CARD0_EMMC, SD_CARD, + UA0, FPGA_IFX, HDMI_TX, LCDIF, USB0_OTG, USB1_OTG ] + + groups: + description: | + Define pin-group in a specified pin-function. + The name should be one of string in the following enumeration. + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string" + enum: [ SPI_FLASH1, SPI_FLASH2, SPI_FLASH_4BIT1, SPI_FLASH_4BIT2, + SPI_NAND, CARD0_EMMC, SD_CARD, UA0, FPGA_IFX, HDMI_TX1, + HDMI_TX2, HDMI_TX3, LCDIF, USB0_OTG, USB1_OTG ]
Is it possible to use Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinmux-node.yaml for this like other drivers do?
+ zero_func: + description: | + Disabled pins which are not used by pinctrl node's client device. + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
I have never seen this before. Can't you just use pin control hogs for this so the pin controller just take care of these pins?
+ allOf: + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - SPI_FLASH + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - SPI_FLASH1 + - SPI_FLASH2 + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - SPI_FLASH_4BIT + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - SPI_FLASH_4BIT1 + - SPI_FLASH_4BIT2 + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - SPI_NAND + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - SPI_NAND + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - CARD0_EMMC + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - CARD0_EMMC + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - SD_CARD + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - SD_CARD + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - UA0 + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - UA0 + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - FPGA_IFX + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - FPGA_IFX + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - HDMI_TX + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - HDMI_TX1 + - HDMI_TX2 + - HDMI_TX3 + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - LCDIF + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - LCDIF + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - USB0_OTG + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - USB0_OTG + - if: + properties: + function: + enum: + - USB1_OTG + then: + properties: + groups: + enum: + - USB1_OTG
This looks complex to me, I need feedback from bindings people on this.
+ pins_uart0: pins_uart0 {
+ function = "UA0";
+ groups = "UA0";
+ };
+
+ pins_uart1: pins_uart1 {
+ pins = <
+ SPPCTL_IOPAD(11,SPPCTL_PCTL_G_PMUX,MUXF_UA1_TX,0)
+ SPPCTL_IOPAD(10,SPPCTL_PCTL_G_PMUX,MUXF_UA1_RX,0)
+ SPPCTL_IOPAD(7,SPPCTL_PCTL_G_GPIO,0,SPPCTL_PCTL_L_OUT)
+ >;
+ };This first looks like two ways to do the same thing? UART0 uses strings for group + function and uart1 control individual pins. Is it possible to just do it one way? I think the pins = <...> scheme includes also multiplexing settings and then it should be named pinmux = <...>: Please read Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinmux-node.yaml closely. Yours, Linus Walleij