Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] reset: Add Sunplus SP7021 reset driver
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-11-02 12:23:23
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, lkml
On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 13:01 +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
Add reset driver for Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
You don't mention Q645 here, it appears this driver supports both SoCs? [...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/reset/Kconfig b/drivers/reset/Kconfig index be799a5ab..50695ab47 100644 --- a/drivers/reset/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/reset/Kconfig@@ -249,6 +249,14 @@ config RESET_TI_SYSCONyou wish to use the reset framework for such memory-mapped devices, say Y here. Otherwise, say N. +config RESET_SUNPLUS
Please add these entries in alphabetical order.
+ bool "Sunplus SoCs Reset Driver"
Can this be made: depends SOC_SP7021 || SOC_Q645 || COMPILE_TEST ?
+ help + This enables the reset driver support for Sunplus SP7021 SoC family. + Say Y if you want to control reset signals by the reset controller. + Otherwise, say N. + This driver is selected automatically by platform config.
Which platform config? [...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunplus.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunplus.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..696efd75e --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunplus.c@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +/* + * SP7021 reset driver + * + * Copyright (C) Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. + * All rights reserved. + * + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details.
Drop this boilerplate, this is not required with the SPDX identifier above.
+ */ +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h> +#include <linux/reboot.h> + +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_SP7021) +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sp-sp7021.h> +#elif defined(CONFIG_SOC_Q645) +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sp-q645.h> +#endif
I'd prefer if you added namespace prefixes to the defines and included both headers unconditionally. These are just required for RST_MAX, correct?
+
+#define BITASSERT(id, val) ((1 << (16 + id)) | (val << id))
+
+
+struct sp_reset_data {
+ struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
+ void __iomem *membase;
+} sp_reset;Please allocate this with devm_kzalloc in the probe function instead.
+
+
+static inline struct sp_reset_data *
+to_sp_reset_data(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev)
+{
+ return container_of(rcdev, struct sp_reset_data, rcdev);
+}
+
+static int sp_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
+ unsigned long id, bool assert)
+{
+ struct sp_reset_data *data = to_sp_reset_data(rcdev);
+ int reg_width = sizeof(u32)/2;
+ int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+ int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+ void __iomem *addr;
+
+ addr = data->membase + (bank * 4);
+
+ if (assert)
+ writel(BITASSERT(offset, 1), addr);
+ else
+ writel(BITASSERT(offset, 0), addr);Could be writel(BITASSERT(offset, assert), addr);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sp_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
+ unsigned long id)
+{
+ return sp_reset_update(rcdev, id, true);
+}
+
+
+static int sp_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
+ unsigned long id)
+{
+ return sp_reset_update(rcdev, id, false);
+}
+
+static int sp_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
+ unsigned long id)
+{
+ struct sp_reset_data *data = to_sp_reset_data(rcdev);
+ int reg_width = sizeof(u32)/2;
+ int bank = id / (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+ int offset = id % (reg_width * BITS_PER_BYTE);
+ u32 reg;
+
+ reg = readl(data->membase + (bank * 4));
+
+ return !!(reg & BIT(offset));
+}
+
+static int sp_restart(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long mode,
+ void *cmd)
+{
+ sp_reset_assert(&sp_reset.rcdev, RST_SYSTEM);
+ sp_reset_deassert(&sp_reset.rcdev, RST_SYSTEM);
+
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block sp_restart_nb = {
+ .notifier_call = sp_restart,
+ .priority = 192,
+};
+
+static const struct reset_control_ops sp_reset_ops = {
+ .assert = sp_reset_assert,
+ .deassert = sp_reset_deassert,
+ .status = sp_reset_status,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id sp_reset_dt_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "sunplus,sp7021-reset", },
+ { .compatible = "sunplus,q645-reset", },
+ { /* sentinel */ },
+};
+
+static int sp_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct sp_reset_data *data = &sp_reset;
+ void __iomem *membase;
+ struct resource *res;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ membase = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
+ if (IS_ERR(membase))
+ return PTR_ERR(membase);
+
+ data->membase = membase;
+ data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ data->rcdev.nr_resets = RST_MAX;Use of_device_get_match_data() to determine the correct number of resets. regards Philipp