Dnia Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 03:47:41PM -0700, Guenter Roeck napisał(a):

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:

quoted

The previous patch introduced per channel subnodes in DT that let us
specify some channel specific properties. This built a ground for easily
disabling individual channels of the sensor that may not be connected to
any external diode and thus are not returning any meaningful data.

This patch adds support for parsing the "status" property of channels DT
subnodes and makes sure the -ENODATA is returned when disabled channels
value is read.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski <redacted>

Same problem as with patch 2/9. Any idea what happened ?

Anyway, applied after fixing it up.

Thank you and sorry for the trouble. It isn't trivial to send patches
via our enterprise mail platform and this time I had to contrive more
than usually. I did use mutt, as I usually do, but had to run it from
different machine. Even though I did use the same config, the mutt
version was different and EDITOR might have been configured differently,
so maybe that created a problem? Or it was the Exchange server which
mangled my patches? I don't know now but I will watch out for that,
thank you for the heads up on that.

Best regards,
Krzysztof Adamski