Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support

[RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support · Matti Vaittinen <hidden> · 2021-10-28
[RESEND PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: regulator: Drop BD70528 support · Matti Vaittinen <hidden> · 2021-10-28
Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: regulator: Drop BD70528 support · Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> · 2021-11-08
[RESEND PATCH 2/4] gpio: bd70528 Drop BD70528 support · Matti Vaittinen <hidden> · 2021-10-28
[RESEND PATCH 3/4] mfd: bd70528: Drop BD70528 support · Matti Vaittinen <hidden> · 2021-10-28
[RESEND PATCH 4/4] MAINTAINERS: bd70528: Drop ROHM BD70528 drivers · Matti Vaittinen <hidden> · 2021-10-28
Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support · Andy Shevchenko <hidden> · 2021-10-31
Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] Drop ROHM BD70528 support · Vaittinen, Matti <hidden> · 2021-11-01

From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-31 13:06:45
Also in: linux-gpio, lkml

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:18 PM Matti Vaittinen
[off-list ref] wrote:

Drop ROHM BD70528 support

I am always for the code removal, but the Q here is do you think there
won't be similar chips that may utilize the code and avoid duplication
in the future?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help