Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: PCI: Add bindings for Brcmstb EP voltage regulators
From: Jim Quinlan <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-27 21:31:57
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 4:54 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 4:27 PM Jim Quinlan [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 6:24 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:06:54AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:quoted
Similar to the regulator bindings found in "rockchip-pcie-host.txt", this allows optional regulators to be attached and controlled by the PCIe RC driver. That being said, this driver searches in the DT subnode (the EP node, eg pci@0,0) for the regulator property. The use of a regulator property in the pcie EP subnode such as "vpcie12v-supply" depends on a pending pullreq to the pci-bus.yaml file at https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/54 Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com> --- .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml index b9589a0daa5c..fec13e4f6eda 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml@@ -154,5 +154,28 @@ examples: <0x42000000 0x1 0x80000000 0x3 0x00000000 0x0 0x80000000>; brcm,enable-ssc; brcm,scb-sizes = <0x0000000080000000 0x0000000080000000>; + + /* PCIe bridge */More specifically, the root port.quoted
+ pci@0,0 { + #address-cells = <3>; + #size-cells = <2>; + reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>; + device_type = "pci"; + ranges; + + /* PCIe endpoint */ + pci@0,0 { + device_type = "pci";This means this device is a PCI bridge which wouldn't typically be the endpoint. Is that intended?Hi Rob, I'm not sure I understand what you are saying -- do you want the innermost node to be named something like ep-pci@0,0, and its containing node pci-bridge@0,0? Or, more likely, I'm missing the point. If my DT subtree is thisI'm confused as to how a bridge is the endpoint. If it is a bridge (which 'device_type = "pci"' means it is), then there should be another PCI device under it. That may or may not have a DT node.
I did not know that device_type="pci" implies that it must be a bridge; [1] says "device_type" is deprecated for PCI and [2] defers to Open Firmware EEE 1275, which is not free AFAICT. Do you have better URLs that describe this? At any rate, I will remove the device_type="pci" from the innermost DT node, and resubmit.
quoted
pcie@8b10000 { compatible = "brcm,bcm7278-pcie"; .... pci-bridge@0,0 { reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>; /* bus 0 */ ..... pci-ep@0,0,0 { reg = <0x10000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>; /* bus 1 */ vpcie3v3-supply = <&vreg8>; ... } } } then the of_nodes appear to align correctly with the devices: $ cd /sys/devices/platform/ $ cat 8b10000.pcie/of_node/name pcie $ cat 8b10000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/of_node pci-bridge $ cat 8b10000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/of_node/name pci-epWhat does 'lspci -tv' show?
$ lspci -tv -+-[0000:01]---00.0 Intel Corporation Wireless 7260 \-[0000:00]---00.0 Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries Device 7278
quoted
and the EP device works of course. I've even printed out the device_node structure in the EP driver's probe and it is as expected. I've noticed that examples such as "arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi" have the EP node (eg pci@1,0) directly under the host bridge DT node (pcie@10003000). I did try doing that, but the EP device's probe is given a NUL device_node pointer.If you want a complex example I know that's right, then see hikey970.
Thanks, will look. Jim [1] https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/devicetree-specification/latest/devicetree-specification.pdf [2] https://www.openfirmware.info/data/docs/bus.pci.pdf
Rob