RE: [PATCH v7 2/4] iio: adc: Add Xilinx AMS driver
From: Anand Ashok Dumbre <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-27 20:36:05
Also in:
linux-iio, lkml
Hi Lars, Thanks for the review.
On 10/19/21 5:20 PM, Anand Ashok Dumbre wrote:quoted
[....] +struct ams { + void __iomem *base; + void __iomem *ps_base; + void __iomem *pl_base; + struct clk *clk; + struct device *dev; + /* check kernel doc above */ + struct mutex lock; + /* check kernel doc above */Do we need this comment?
Will remove.
quoted
+ spinlock_t intr_lock; + unsigned int alarm_mask; + unsigned int masked_alarm; + u64 intr_mask; + int irq;The irq field is only ever used in the probe function. Could be made a local variable.
Will make it local.
quoted
+ struct delayed_work ams_unmask_work; }; [...] +static void ams_enable_channel_sequence(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) { + int i; + unsigned long long scan_mask; + struct ams *ams = iio_priv(indio_dev); + + /* + * Enable channel sequence. First 22 bits of scan_mask represent + * PS channels, and next remaining bits represent PL channels. + */ + + /* Run calibration of PS & PL as part of the sequence */ + scan_mask = 0x1 | BIT(AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX); + for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++) + scan_mask |= BIT_ULL(indio_dev->channels[i].scan_index);There are channels with a scan index > 63. These need to be skipped here to avoid undefined behavior. UBSAN is reporting an error here.
I will fix it.
quoted
[...] + if (ams->pl_base) { + /* put sysmon in a soft reset to change the sequence */ + ams_pl_update_reg(ams, AMS_REG_CONFIG1,AMS_CONF1_SEQ_MASK,quoted
+ AMS_CONF1_SEQ_DEFAULT); + + /* configure basic channels */ + scan_mask = FIELD_GET(AMS_PL_SEQ_MASK, scan_mask); + writel(FIELD_GET(AMS_REG_SEQ0_MASK, scan_mask), + ams->pl_base + AMS_REG_SEQ_CH0); + writel(FIELD_GET(AMS_REG_SEQ2_MASK, scan_mask), + ams->pl_base + AMS_REG_SEQ_CH2); + writel(FIELD_GET(AMS_REG_SEQ1_MASK, scan_mask), + ams->pl_base + AMS_REG_SEQ_CH1);Hm, the ordering is a bit strange here: 0, 2, 1.
Will reorder 0,1,2.
quoted
+ + /* set continuous sequence mode */ + ams_pl_update_reg(ams, AMS_REG_CONFIG1,AMS_CONF1_SEQ_MASK,quoted
+ AMS_CONF1_SEQ_CONTINUOUS); + } +} + + [...] + +static int ams_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, + int *val, int *val2, long mask) +{ + struct ams *ams = iio_priv(indio_dev); + int ret; + + switch (mask) { + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: + mutex_lock(&ams->lock); + if (chan->scan_index >= (AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX * 3)) {This AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX * 3 really deserves a define. AMS_CTRL_SEQ_BASE or something like that.
Will do.
quoted
+ ret = ams_read_vcc_reg(ams, chan->address, val); + if (ret) { + mutex_unlock(&ams->lock); + return -EINVAL; + } + ams_enable_channel_sequence(indio_dev); + } else if (chan->scan_index >= AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX) + *val = readl(ams->pl_base + chan->address); + else + *val = readl(ams->ps_base + chan->address); + mutex_unlock(&ams->lock); + + return IIO_VAL_INT; + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE: + switch (chan->type) { + case IIO_VOLTAGE: + switch (chan->address) { + case AMS_SUPPLY1: + case AMS_SUPPLY2: + case AMS_SUPPLY3: + case AMS_SUPPLY4: + *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_3VOLT; + break; + case AMS_SUPPLY5: + case AMS_SUPPLY6: + if (chan->scan_index < AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX) + *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_6VOLT; + else + *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_3VOLT; + break; + case AMS_SUPPLY7: + case AMS_SUPPLY8: + *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_6VOLT; + break; + case AMS_SUPPLY9: + case AMS_SUPPLY10: + if (chan->scan_index < AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX) + *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_3VOLT; + else + *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_6VOLT; + break;For the PL the range of supply 7 to 10 depends on the CONFIG_REG4 and can be either 3V or 6V. Might be worth checking that register, rather than hardcoding the value.
Yes it seems better to do.
quoted
+ case AMS_VCC_PSPLL0: + case AMS_VCC_PSPLL3: + case AMS_VCCINT: + case AMS_VCCBRAM: + case AMS_VCCAUX: + case AMS_PSDDRPLL: + case AMS_PSINTFPDDR:This is missing AMS_VCCAMS, AMS_VREFP, AMS_VREFN. They all use the 3V scale. The only ones on a 1V scale are the external channels. Maye it is easier to write this as case AMS_VP_VN: case AMS_REG_VAUX ... AMS_REG_VAUX(15): *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_1VOLT; break; default: *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_3VOLT; break;
Will fix this as well.
quoted
+ *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_3VOLT; + break; + default: + *val = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_1VOLT; + break; + } + *val2 = AMS_SUPPLY_SCALE_DIV_BIT; + return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2; + case IIO_TEMP: + *val = AMS_TEMP_SCALE; + *val2 = AMS_TEMP_SCALE_DIV_BIT; + return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET: + /* Only the temperature channel has an offset */ + *val = AMS_TEMP_OFFSET; + return IIO_VAL_INT; + } + + return -EINVAL; +} + [...] +static int ams_init_module(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct device_node*np,quoted
+ struct iio_chan_spec *channels) { + struct ams *ams = iio_priv(indio_dev); + int num_channels = 0; + + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "xlnx,zynqmp-ams-ps")) { + ams->ps_base = of_iomap(np, 0);No unmap anywhere in the driver. Same for the other base addresses.
Will add in remove function.
quoted
[...] + + return num_channels; +} [...] +static int ams_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { [...] + ams->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(ams->clk)) + return PTR_ERR(ams->clk); + clk_prepare_enable(ams->clk); + devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,ams_clk_disable_unprepare,quoted
+ ams->clk);Needs to check for errors. Same for other users of devm_add_action_or_reset().quoted
+ + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ams->ams_unmask_work,ams_unmask_worker);quoted
+ devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,ams_cancel_delayed_work,quoted
+ &ams->ams_unmask_work); + + ret = ams_init_device(ams); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to initialize AMS\n"); + return ret; + } + + ret = ams_parse_dt(indio_dev, pdev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failure in parsing DT\n"); + return ret; + } + + ams_enable_channel_sequence(indio_dev); + + ams->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (ams->irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {What about other errors? E.g. if the interrupt is not specified int he devicetree we'll pass the invalid irq number to request_irq().
Correct. Will return if ret < 0.
quoted
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; + return ret; + } + + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ams->irq, &ams_irq, 0, "ams-irq",quoted
+ indio_dev); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register interrupt\n"); + return ret; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev); + + ret = devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev); + + return ret; +}
Thanks, Anand