On 21-10-21, 11:10, Horatiu Vultur wrote:

The 10/21/2021 11:40, Vinod Koul wrote:

quoted

On 20-10-21, 17:49, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

quoted

On 20/10/2021 21:05:49+0530, Vinod Koul wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)

Any reason why this is dual licensed, why not GPL only?

No reason, I think I copy this from a different file.

Please have a chat with your lawyers on the correct license this should
have!

Dual GPL and MIT was Microsemi's policy, I'm not sure it carried over to
Microchip.

That is why they need to talk to someone and decide what license
applies :)

I have changed it to be the same as the one on sparx5 because also
sparx5 is a Microchip product. On sparx5 we used:
'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later'

Has the code been copied/derived from somewhere/auto generated from
scripts/tools or entirely written by you?

-- 
~Vinod