The 10/08/2021 13:56, Kavyasree Kotagiri wrote:

This adds Generic Clock Controller driver for lan966x SoC.

Hi Kavya,

+#define DIV_MAX		256
+
+static const char *clk_names[N_CLOCKS] = {
+	"qspi0", "qspi1", "qspi2", "sdmmc0",
+	"pi", "mcan0", "mcan1", "flexcom0",
+	"flexcom1", "flexcom2", "flexcom3",
+	"flexcom4", "timer", "usb_refclk",
+};

Aren't these names a little bit generic, especially 'timer'?
The problem that I am seeing, if there is another clock driver that
register a clock with the same name, then this will fail. Here is the
check for this[1]

+
+static int lan966x_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *hw_data;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	int i;
+
+	hw_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*hw_data), GFP_KERNEL);

Is this correct? Shouldn't be

devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(hw_data, hws, N_CLOCKS), GFP_KERNEL);

+	if (!hw_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(base))
+		return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+	init.ops = &lan966x_gck_ops;
+
+	hw_data->num = N_CLOCKS;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < N_CLOCKS; i++) {
+		init.name = clk_names[i];
+		hw_data->hws[i] = lan966x_gck_clk_register(dev, i);
+		if (IS_ERR(hw_data->hws[i])) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s clock\n",
+				init.name);
+			return PTR_ERR(hw_data->hws[i]);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, hw_data);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id lan966x_clk_dt_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "microchip,lan966x-gck", },
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lan966x_clk_dt_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver lan966x_clk_driver = {
+	.probe  = lan966x_clk_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "lan966x-clk",
+		.of_match_table = lan966x_clk_dt_ids,
+	},
+};
+builtin_platform_driver(lan966x_clk_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Kavyasree Kotagiri [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LAN966X clock driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.17.1

[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/clk/clk.c#L3423

-- 
/Horatiu