Re: [PATCH v8 04/12] iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb devices
From: Dafna Hirschfeld <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-18 07:13:36
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-iommu, linux-media, linux-mediatek, lkml
On 16.10.21 04:23, Yong Wu wrote:
On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 14:36 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:quoted
On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:quoted
MediaTek IOMMU-SMI diagram is like below. all the consumer connect with smi-larb, then connect with smi-common. M4U | smi-common | ------------- | | ... | | larb1 larb2 | | vdec venc When the consumer works, it should enable the smi-larb's power which also need enable the smi-common's power firstly. Thus, First of all, use the device link connect the consumer and the smi-larbs. then add device link between the smi-larb and smi- common. This patch adds device_link between the consumer and the larbs. When device_link_add, I add the flag DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid calling pm_runtime_xx to keep the original status of clocks. It can avoid two issues: 1) Display HW show fastlogo abnormally reported in [1]. At the beggining, all the clocks are enabled before entering kernel, but the clocks for display HW(always in larb0) will be gated after clk_enable and clk_disable called from device_link_add(->pm_runtime_resume) and rpm_idle. The clock operation happened before display driver probe. At that time, the display HW will be abnormal. 2) A deadlock issue reported in [2]. Use DL_FLAG_STATELESS to skip pm_runtime_xx to avoid the deadlock. Corresponding, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER can't be added, then device_link_removed should be added explicitly. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/1564213888.22908.4.camel@mhfsdcap03/ (local) [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086569/ Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> Tested-by: Frank Wunderlich <redacted> # BPI- R2/MT7623 --- drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c index d5848f78a677..a2fa55899434 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c@@ -560,22 +560,44 @@ static struct iommu_device*mtk_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev) { struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); struct mtk_iommu_data *data; + struct device_link *link; + struct device *larbdev; + unsigned int larbid; if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &mtk_iommu_ops) return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); /* Not a iommu client device */ data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); + /* + * Link the consumer device with the smi-larb device(supplier) + * The device in each a larb is a independent HW. thus only link + * one larb here. + */ + larbid = MTK_M4U_TO_LARB(fwspec->ids[0]);so larbid is always the same for all the ids of a device?Yes. For me, each a dtsi node should represent a HW unit which can only connect one larb.quoted
If so maybe it worth testing it and return error if this is not the case.Thanks for the suggestion. This is very helpful. I did see someone put the different larbs in one node. I will check this, and add return
I am working on bugs found on media drivers, could you please point me to that wrong node? Will you send a fix to that node in the dtsi? Thanks, Dafna
EINVAL for this case.
quoted
Thanks, Dafnaquoted
quoted