Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 4 authors, 2022-01-31

Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm8250: stop using mmcx regulator

From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-10-15 00:04:57
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-clk, lkml

Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-14 02:53:41)
On 13/10/2021 22:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2021-10-07 09:16:13)
quoted
On 07/10/2021 18:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
quoted
On Sun 29 Aug 08:47 PDT 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
quoted
Now as the common qcom clock controller code has been taught about power
domains, stop mentioning mmcx supply as a way to power up the clock
controller's gdsc.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <redacted>
Once we merge these, I expect that the boards will start crashing if
the kernel is booted using an existing DTB?

Is it okay to just merge the first 6 patches in the series now and
postpone these two until we've had the dts change sitting for a while?
Sure it is.
What's the merge strategy? It goes through arm-soc?
I think this should go through the clk tree. There is little chance of 
conflicts.
The other thing that concerns me is that we don't have backwards
compat code. If things are going to start crashing that's not very nice.
Is there some way to make it work with old and new DTB for one release
so that we don't have to worry about this problem?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help