Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: Add lan966x support

Hi Philipp,

The 10/14/2021 13:55, Philipp Zabel wrote:

On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 09:38 +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:

quoted

This adds support for lan966x.

Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml   | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
index 370579aeeca1..fb170ed2c57a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/microchip,rst.yaml

@@ -20,7 +20,11 @@ properties:
     pattern: "^reset-controller@[0-9a-f]+$"

   compatible:
-    const: microchip,sparx5-switch-reset
+    oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - const: microchip,sparx5-switch-reset
+      - items:
+          - const: microchip,lan966x-switch-reset

   reg:
     items:

@@ -37,6 +41,14 @@ properties:
     $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle"
     description: syscon used to access CPU reset

+  cuphy-syscon:
+    $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle"
+    description: syscon used to access CuPHY

Can this be used on sparx5?

No, because the sparx5 doesn't have any internal PHYs that need to
be released of the reset.

Is it optional on lan966x?

No, it is required on lan966x. I will update the binding to show this.

quoted

+  phy-reset-gpios:
+    description: used for release of reset of the external PHY
+    maxItems: 1
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - reg

I'd like somebody to reassure me that putting the CuPHY reset and
external PHY GPIO reset in the reset controller is the right thing to
do.

It looks fine to me, but I'm not sure if these should rather be in
separate phy nodes that are referenced from the switch.

regards
Philipp

-- 
/Horatiu