Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source

[PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> · 2021-10-12
[PATCH 2/2] i2c: at91: add support for brsrcclk · Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> · 2021-10-12
[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: Extend compatible list for lan966x · Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> · 2021-10-12
Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: Extend compatible list for lan966x · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2021-10-22
Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · <Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com> · 2021-10-13
Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · Horatiu Vultur - M31836 <Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com> · 2021-10-13
Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · <Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com> · 2021-10-13
Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> · 2021-11-05
Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · <Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com> · 2021-11-08
Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · Horatiu Vultur - M31836 <Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com> · 2021-11-08
Re: [PATCH 0/2] i2c: at91: Add support for programmable clock source · Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> · 2021-11-29

From: <Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Date: 2021-10-13 13:10:42
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-i2c, lkml

I think actually I will drop this patch series because apparently
lan966x works fine also with the peripheral clock. So then no changes
are required.

If you think is worth it, I can do another version with the proposed
changes.

Probably not until we have an implemented good reason to use GCLK.

Best regards,
Codrin

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help