Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bgmac: support MDIO described in DT
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-09-21 00:49:30
Also in:
netdev
On 20.09.2021 18:11, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 9/20/21 5:34 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:quoted
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> Check ethernet controller DT node for "mdio" subnode and use it with of_mdiobus_register() when present. That allows specifying MDIO and its PHY devices in a standard DT based way. This is required for BCM53573 SoC support which has an MDIO attached switch. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma-mdio.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma-mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma-mdio.c index 6ce80cbcb48e..086739e4f40a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma-mdio.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac-bcma-mdio.c@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/bcma/bcma.h> #include <linux/brcmphy.h> +#include <linux/of_mdio.h> #include "bgmac.h" static bool bcma_mdio_wait_value(struct bcma_device *core, u16 reg, u32 mask,@@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ struct mii_bus *bcma_mdio_mii_register(struct bgmac *bgmac) { struct bcma_device *core = bgmac->bcma.core; struct mii_bus *mii_bus; + struct device_node *np; int err; mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();@@ -229,7 +231,9 @@ struct mii_bus *bcma_mdio_mii_register(struct bgmac *bgmac) mii_bus->parent = &core->dev; mii_bus->phy_mask = ~(1 << bgmac->phyaddr); - err = mdiobus_register(mii_bus); + np = of_get_child_by_name(core->dev.of_node, "mdio");I believe this leaks np and the use case is not exactly clear to me here. AFAICT the Northstar SoCs have two MDIO controllers: one for internal PHYs and one for external PHYs which how you would attach a switch to the chip (in chipcommonA). Is 53573 somewhat different here? What is the MDIO bus driver that is being used?
of_get_child_by_name() doesn't seem to increase refcount or anything and
I think it's how most drivers handle it. I don't think it should leak.
BCM53573 is a built with some older blocks. Please check:
4ebd50472899 ("ARM: BCM53573: Initial support for Broadcom BCM53573 SoCs")
BCM53573 series is a new family with embedded wireless. By marketing
people it's sometimes called Northstar but it uses different CPU and has
different architecture so we need a new symbol for it.
Fortunately it shares some peripherals with other iProc based SoCs so we
will be able to reuse some drivers/bindings.
e90d2d51c412 ("ARM: BCM5301X: Add basic dts for BCM53573 based Tenda AC9")
BCM53573 seems to be low priced alternative for Northstar chipsts. It
uses single core Cortex-A7 and doesn't have SDU or local (TWD) timer. It
was also stripped out of independent SPI controller and 2 GMACs.
Northstar uses SRAB which is some memory based (0x18007000) access to
switch register space.
BCM53573 uses different blocks & mappings and it doesn't include SRAB at
0x18007000. Accessing switch registers is handled over MDIO.