Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Add multi-pd bindings for dwc3 qcom
From: Bjorn Andersson <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-30 16:05:38
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-usb, lkml
On Thu 30 Sep 02:41 PDT 2021, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote:
On 9/7/2021 7:20 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:quoted
On Mon 30 Aug 10:54 PDT 2021, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote:quoted
Add multi pd bindings to set performance state for cx domain to maintain minimum corner voltage for USB clocks. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml index e70afc4..838d9c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml@@ -41,7 +41,18 @@ properties: power-domains: description: specifies a phandle to PM domain provider node - maxItems: 1 + minItems: 1 + items: + - description: optional,cx power domain + - description: USB gdsc power domain + + power-domain-names: + items: + - const: cx + - const: usb_gdscBut "usb_gdsc" is a subdomain of "cx", why can't we describe this fact in gcc? Regards, BjornThanks for your review. Any idea on how can this be described in gcc ? Can you point any reference for this .
There's a series from Dmitry that defines such a relationship between MDSS_GDSC and the MMCX domain on SM8250. This seems like a continuation of that support, given that we have multiple parent domains (cx, mx etc). You can find that discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210727202004.712665-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/ (local) Regards, Bjorn
Regards Sandeepquoted
quoted
+ + required-opps: + description: specifies the performance state to cx power domain clocks: description: -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation