Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: sc7180: Factor out ti-sn65dsi86 support
From: Philip Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-28 23:12:29
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
From: Philip Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-28 23:12:29
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi Stephen, On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 1:54 PM Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:
Quoting Philip Chen (2021-09-27 18:49:39)quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7b1034a5a8e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) +/* + * Google Trogdor dts fragment for the boards with TI sn65dsi86 edp bridge + * + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC. + */ + +&dsi0_out { + remote-endpoint = <&sn65dsi86_in>; + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>; +}; + +&edp_brij_i2c { + sn65dsi86_bridge: bridge@2d { + compatible = "ti,sn65dsi86"; + reg = <0x2d>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&edp_brij_en>, <&edp_brij_irq>;I still don't see edp_brij_en used in the second patch so why didn't this pinctrl node move to this file like edp_brij_irq did?
edp_brij_en is also used in patch 2/2 (ps8640 support). So I don't want to move it to this file.
quoted
+ gpio-controller; + #gpio-cells = <2>;