Re: [PATCH] Revert "of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for "phy-handle" property"
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-09-17 16:59:20
Also in:
lkml
On 9/16/21 7:27 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 7:21 PM Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 9/15/2021 1:19 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:quoted
This reverts commit cf4b94c8530d14017fbddae26aad064ddc42edd4. Some PHYs pointed to by "phy-handle" will never bind to a driver until a consumer attaches to it. And when the consumer attaches to it, they get forcefully bound to a generic PHY driver. In such cases, parsing the phy-handle property and creating a device link will prevent the consumer from ever probing. We don't want that. So revert support for "phy-handle" property until we come up with a better mechanism for binding PHYs to generic drivers before a consumer tries to attach to it. Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <redacted>Thanks for getting this revert submitted, I just ran a bisection this afternoon that pointed to this offending commit. It would cause the dead lockDead lock in the kernel? Or do you mean just a hang waiting forever for network?
It locks up since we try to acquire __device_driver_lock() while we are in the main driver's probe function.
quoted
on boot with drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c pasted below.The log is too jumbled up to be readable (word wrap I suppose) and maybe even multiple thread printing at the same time.
Re-attached (thunderbird is not really helping me).
quoted
Saravana, can you CC on me on your fix or what you would want me to be testing?By fix, I assume you mean when I bring back phy-handle with a proper fix to handle the case in the commit text? Yeah, that's going to take a while. It's brewing in my head and there are some issues that's not fully resolved. But I haven't had time to code it up or dig into the net code to make sure it'll work. But yes, I'll CC you when I do so you can test it with this case.
Well by fix, I meant something that does not lock up on my system, it is a different problem from supporting 'phy-handle', but it should not regress an existing system, no matter how quirky that system behaves in its probe function. For history and reference, the "offending" change and background can be found here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=771089c2a485958e423f305e974303760167b45c Thanks for your patience working on the quirky MDIO/PHY subsystem :) -- Florian
Attachments
- 7445d0-lockup.log [text/x-log] 22517 bytes · preview