Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2021-09-09

RE: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add WPSS remoteproc node

flat view

From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-09 08:39:02
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Boyd <redacted>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 1:22 AM
To: Rakesh Pillai <redacted>; agross@kernel.org;
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org; robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; sibis@codeaurora.org; mpubbise@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add WPSS remoteproc
node

Quoting Rakesh Pillai (2021-08-10 11:11:29)
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index 53a21d0..41a7826 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -74,6 +74,16 @@
                        reg = <0 0x8b700000 0 0x10000>;
                        no-map;
                };
+
+               wlan_fw_mem: memory@80c00000 {
+                       no-map;
+                       reg = <0x0 0x80c00000 0x0 0xc00000>;
+               };
Please try to keep this sorted by reg address. 80c00000 comes before
8b700000.
Hi Stephen,
I will fix this and send v3 for this patch.

quoted
+
+               wpss_mem: memory@9ae00000 {
+                       no-map;
+                       reg = <0x0 0x9ae00000 0x0 0x1900000>;
+               };
        };

        cpus {
@@ -1270,6 +1280,53 @@
                        };
                };

+               remoteproc_wpss: remoteproc@8a00000 {
+                       compatible = "qcom,sc7280-wpss-pil";
+                       reg = <0 0x08a00000 0 0x10000>;
+
+                       interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 587
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
quoted
+                                             <&wpss_smp2p_in 0 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+                                             <&wpss_smp2p_in 1 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+                                             <&wpss_smp2p_in 2 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+                                             <&wpss_smp2p_in 3 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
+                                             <&wpss_smp2p_in 7
+ IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
Is this IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING? Please add some type of edge or level flag.
I will change it to IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING and send out the next revision.
quoted
+                       interrupt-names = "wdog", "fatal", "ready", "handover",
+                                         "stop-ack", "shutdown-ack";
+
+                       clocks = <&gcc GCC_WPSS_AHB_BDG_MST_CLK>,
+                                <&gcc GCC_WPSS_AHB_CLK>,
+                                <&gcc GCC_WPSS_RSCP_CLK>,
+                                <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
+                       clock-names = "gcc_wpss_ahb_bdg_mst_clk",
+                                     "gcc_wpss_ahb_clk",
+                                     "gcc_wpss_rscp_clk",
+                                     "xo";
+
+                       memory-region = <&wpss_mem>;
+
+                       qcom,smem-states = <&wpss_smp2p_out 0>;
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help