Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Add interrupt-names
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-08-11 15:30:12
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-renesas-soc
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-08-11 15:30:12
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-renesas-soc
Hi Wolfram, On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:23 PM Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The Renesas RZ/A and RZ/G2L I2C Bus Interface has no less than 8 interrupts. So I think it makes sense to use "interrupt-names" property, to make it easier to review the interrupt mappings in DTS files. Hence this series documents the "interrupt-names" property in the DT bindings, adds the property to the DTS files, and marks it required in the DT bindings. Obviously the last step cannot be applied until all earlier patches are upstream. What do you think?I like it and I'd think it is good to go. It is probably easiest if you take the series via your tree to avoid merge conflicts and/or subsystem dependencies. It's unlikely the YAML file will see further updates. So, for the series:
Probably it is not worth doing this in lockstep (1/4 in v5.15 through i2c, 2/4 and 3/4 in v5.16 through renesas-devel, and 4/4 in v5.17 through i2c). I have different branches for DT binding and DTS, but I guess it doesn't hurt to deviate and apply both to renesas-arm-dt-for-v5.15...
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds