On 2021-08-12 18:39, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:11:12PM +0530, Rajesh Patil wrote:

quoted

From: Roja Rani Yarubandi <redacted>

Add QSPI DT node and qspi_opp_table for SC7280 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Roja Rani Yarubandi <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Patil <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 62 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi 

b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index 53a21d0..f8dd5ff 100644

--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi

@@ -415,6 +415,25 @@
 		method = "smc";
 	};

+	qspi_opp_table: qspi-opp-table {
+		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+
+		opp-75000000 {
+			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <75000000>;
+			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
+		};
+
+		opp-150000000 {
+			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <150000000>;
+			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
+		};
+
+		opp-300000000 {
+			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <300000000>;
+			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
+		};
+	};
+

From v3:

roja> Can we move this "qspi_opp_table" to / from /soc?

bjorn> If you have made a proper attempt to convince Rob and Mark that
bjorn> a child "opp-table" in a SPI master is not a SPI device - and 
the
bjorn> conclusion is that this is not a good idea...then yes it should 
live
bjorn> outside /soc.

I didn't see a follow up on this, was such an attempt made? Is there a
link to the discussion?

For now I am keeping qspi_opp_table  and qup_opp_table outside the SoC 
and posting V6.
I will continue the discussion with DT folks and once concluded I will 
update as required.