Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192
From: Hsin-hsiung Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-16 12:11:43
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi, On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 10:55 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Hsin-Hsiung Wang (2021-08-02 23:34:19)quoted
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..94c45d46ab0c --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c@@ -0,0 +1,465 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// +// Copyright (c) 2021 MediaTek Inc. + +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h>include platform_device.h for the platform device driver that this is.
Thanks for the commit, I will update it in the next patch.
quoted
+#include <linux/spmi.h> + +#define SWINF_IDLE 0x00 +#define SWINF_WFVLDCLR 0x06 + +#define GET_SWINF(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x7) + +#define PMIF_CMD_REG_0 0 +#define PMIF_CMD_REG 1 +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG 2 +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG 3 + +#define PMIF_DELAY_US 10 +#define PMIF_TIMEOUT_US (10 * 1000) + +#define PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET 0x5 + +#define PMIF_MAX_CLKS 3 + +#define SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY 1 + +struct ch_reg { + u32 ch_sta; + u32 wdata; + u32 rdata; + u32 ch_send; + u32 ch_rdy; +}; + +struct pmif_data { + const u32 *regs; + const u32 *spmimst_regs; + u32 soc_chan; +}; + +struct pmif { + void __iomem *base; + void __iomem *spmimst_base; + struct ch_reg chan; + struct clk_bulk_data clks[PMIF_MAX_CLKS]; + u32 nclks;size_t? Surely 32-bits isn't important.
Thanks. I will use size_t in the next patch.
quoted
+ const struct pmif_data *data; +}; + +static const char * const pmif_clock_names[] = { + "pmif_sys_ck", "pmif_tmr_ck", "spmimst_clk_mux", +};[...]quoted
+ +static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb) +{ + u32 reg_rdata; + + reg_rdata = pmif_readl(arb, arb->chan.ch_sta);Newline here please.
Thanks, I will update it in the next patch.
quoted
+ return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR; +} + +static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid) +{ + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl); + u32 rdata, cmd; + int ret; + + /* Check the opcode */ + if (opc < SPMI_CMD_RESET || opc > SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP) + return -EINVAL; + + cmd = opc - SPMI_CMD_RESET; + + mtk_spmi_writel(arb, (cmd << 0x4) | sid, SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL); + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->spmimst_base + arb->data->spmimst_regs[SPMI_OP_ST_STA], + rdata, (rdata & SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY) == SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY, + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "timeout, err = %d\n", ret); + + return ret; +} + +static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid, + u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len) +{ + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl); + struct ch_reg *inf_reg; + int ret; + u32 data, cmd; + + /* Check for argument validation. */ + if (sid & ~0xf) { + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (len > 4) { + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);Missing newline
Thanks, I will update it in the next patch.
quoted
+ return -EINVAL; + } + + if (opc >= 0x60 && opc <= 0x7f) + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG; + else if ((opc >= 0x20 && opc <= 0x2f) || (opc >= 0x38 && opc <= 0x3f)) + opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG; + else + return -EINVAL; + + /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */ + inf_reg = &arb->chan; + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta], + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE, + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US); + if (ret < 0) { + /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */ + if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb)) + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy); + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n"); + goto out; + } + + /* Send the command. */ + cmd = (opc << 30) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr; + pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send); + + /* + * Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be WFVLDCLR, + * read the data and clear the valid flag. + */ + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta], + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR, + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_WFVLDCLR\n"); + goto out; + } + + data = pmif_readl(arb, inf_reg->rdata); + memcpy(buf, &data, len); + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy); + +out: + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid, + u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len) +{ + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl); + struct ch_reg *inf_reg; + int ret; + u32 data, cmd; + + if (len > 4) { + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);Missing newline
Thanks, I will update it in the next patch.
quoted
+ return -EINVAL; + } + + /* Check the opcode */ + if (opc >= 0x40 && opc <= 0x5F) + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG; + else if ((opc <= 0xF) || (opc >= 0x30 && opc <= 0x37)) + opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG; + else if (opc >= 0x80) + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG_0; + else + return -EINVAL; + + /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */ + inf_reg = &arb->chan; + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta], + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE, + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US); + if (ret < 0) { + /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */ + if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb)) + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy); + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n"); + goto out; + } + + /* Set the write data. */ + memcpy(&data, buf, len); + pmif_writel(arb, data, inf_reg->wdata); + + /* Send the command. */ + cmd = (opc << 30) | BIT(29) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr; + pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send); + +out: + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return 0;Simplify to out: return ret;
Thanks, I will update it in the next patch.
quoted
+} + +static const struct pmif_data mt6873_pmif_arb = { + .regs = mt6873_regs, + .spmimst_regs = mt6873_spmi_regs, + .soc_chan = 2, +}; + +static int mtk_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct pmif *arb; + struct spmi_controller *ctrl; + int err, i; + u32 chan_offset; + + ctrl = spmi_controller_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*arb)); + if (!ctrl) + return -ENOMEM; + + arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl); + arb->data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);Use device_get_match_data() instead please.
Thanks, I will change to use device_get_match_data in the next patch.
quoted
+ if (!arb->data) { + err = -EINVAL; + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot get drv_data\n"); + goto err_put_ctrl; + } + + arb->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "pmif"); + if (IS_ERR(arb->base)) { + err = PTR_ERR(arb->base); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pmif failed to get the remappped memory\n");Please drop print as the API already prints errors for every problem.
Thanks, I will update it in the next patch.
quoted
+ goto err_put_ctrl; + } + + arb->spmimst_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "spmimst"); + if (IS_ERR(arb->spmimst_base)) { + err = PTR_ERR(arb->spmimst_base); + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "spmimst failed to get the remappped memory\n");Please drop print as the API already prints errors for every problem.
Thanks, I will update it in the next patch.
quoted
+ goto err_put_ctrl; + } + + arb->nclks = ARRAY_SIZE(pmif_clock_names); + if (arb->nclks > PMIF_MAX_CLKS) { + err = -EINVAL; + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "exceed the max clock numbers\n");Do we really care? The dt schema should be checking this instead of the driver.
Thanks, I will remove the check in the next patch.
quoted
+ goto err_put_ctrl; + } + + for (i = 0; i < arb->nclks; i++) + arb->clks[i].id = pmif_clock_names[i]; +