Hi,
Resending my reply as my Mail client settings prevented delivery

On 05/08/21 6:38 pm, Mark Brown wrote:

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 08:58:58AM -0400, Peter Geis wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:47 AM Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

One thing to watch out for with this approach is if there's things that
really need a specific voltage to be set then you'll have to stop those
things happening if you've got a voltage regulator that can't deliver a
voltage in the required range.  I don't know if this affects MMC or not,
if it's just a case of being less efficient it's not such an issue.

quoted

Yeah, but if this is a fixed regulator and it's a problem, then the
hardware is screwed anyways.

Well, the fact that the voltage is being changed at runtime indicates
that we're changing something from whatever was in the fixed setup - it
can sometimes be that we don't have access to some higher performance or
lower power features for example.  That's not ideal but works perfectly
safely.

Suggested approach of checking "mmc->ocr_avail" might work.

But, IMO mmc core should check if the voltage can be changed or not

before trying to do regulator_set_voltage() in mmc_regulator_set_ocr().

Wouldn't that be better and solve this issue for other hosts as well.

Something like below in mmc_regulator_set_ocr ():

+               result = regulator_check_voltage_constraints(supply,
+                       min_uV, max_uV);
+               if(!result) {
+                       result = regulator_set_voltage(supply, min_uV, 
max_uV);
+                       if (result != -EINVAL && !mmc->regulator_enabled) {
+                               result = regulator_enable(supply);
+                               if (!result)
+                                       mmc->regulator_enabled = true;
+                       }

We could wrap the existing check_voltage function

+/* Check voltage constraints helper function */
+int regulator_check_voltage_constraints(struct regulator *regulator,
+                                       int min_uV, int max_uV)
+{
+       return regulator_check_voltage(regulator->rdev, &min_uV, &max_uV);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_check_voltage_constraints);

I hope this makes sense.

Regards,
RK