Re: [PATCH 14/39] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: Add TSENS node
From: Thara Gopinath <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-29 11:14:45
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
On 7/29/21 6:55 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 29.07.2021 12:54, Thara Gopinath wrote:quoted
On 7/29/21 6:52 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:quoted
On 29.07.2021 12:50, Thara Gopinath wrote:quoted
Hi Konrad, On 7/28/21 6:25 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:quoted
This will enable temperature reporting for various SoC components. Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <redacted> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml index 4a2eaf28e3fd..d3b9e9b600a2 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ properties: - qcom,sc7180-tsens - qcom,sc7280-tsens - qcom,sc8180x-tsens + - qcom,sdm630-tsens - qcom,sdm845-tsens - qcom,sm8150-tsens - qcom,sm8250-tsensdiff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi index 1e54828817d5..7e9c80e35fba 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi@@ -627,6 +627,17 @@ mnoc: interconnect@1745000 { <&mmcc AHB_CLK_SRC>; }; + tsens: thermal-sensor@10ae000 { + compatible = "qcom,sdm630-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2"; + reg = <0x010ae000 0x1000>, /* TM */ + <0x010ad000 0x1000>; /* SROT */ + #qcom,sensors = <12>;Are all 12 sensors used ? I see that in a later patch "arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: Add thermal-zones configuration" only 9 are used.Hi, if I recall correctly, they all give output but not all of the mappings were documented in the downstream sources and we have no documentation whatsoever :(Right. In that case, why not change #qcom,sensors to 9 and add rest of the sensors if and when needed ?I don't think it makes sense to describe the hardware incorrectly, even if some of it is unused.
My thinking was more along the lines of don't expose unused h/w bits.
-- Warm Regards Thara (She/Her/Hers)