Hi Marc,

On 16/06/21 2:47 pm, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

On 14.06.2021 18:02:53, Aswath Govindraju wrote:

quoted

Hi Marc,

On 10/05/21 10:55 am, Aswath Govindraju wrote:

quoted

The following series of patches add support for implementing the
transceiver as a phy of m_can_platform driver.

TCAN1042 has a standby signal that needs to be pulled high for
sending/receiving messages[1]. TCAN1043 has a enable signal along with
standby signal that needs to be pulled up for sending/receiving
messages[2], and other combinations of the two lines can be used to put the
transceiver in different states to reduce power consumption. On boards
like the AM654-idk and J721e-evm these signals are controlled using gpios.

These gpios are set in phy driver, and the transceiver can be put in
different states using phy API. The phy driver is added in the series [3].

This patch series is dependent on [4].

[4] is now part of linux-next

quoted

[4] - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1413286/

May I know if this series is okay to be picked up ?

As soon as this hits net-next/master I can pick up this series.

Thank you for reply.

I am planning on posting device tree patches to arm64 tree and
Nishanth(maintainer of the tree) requested for an immutable tag if the
dependent patches are not in master. So, after applying this patch
series, can you please provide an immutable tag ?

Thanks,
Aswath

Marc