Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] iio: afe: rescale: add offset support
From: Liam Beguin <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-05 04:27:43
Also in:
linux-iio, lkml
On Sun Jul 4, 2021 at 12:53 PM EDT, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 21:00:30 -0400 Liam Beguin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Liam Beguin <redacted> This is a preparatory change required for the addition of temperature sensing front ends. Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <redacted>Hi Liam. A few remaining things inline. Looking good in general. Jonathanquoted
--- drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c index 8f79c582519c..c8750286c308 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c +++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct rescale { bool chan_processed; s32 numerator; s32 denominator; + s32 offset; }; static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,@@ -39,6 +40,8 @@ static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int *val, int *val2, long mask) { struct rescale *rescale = iio_priv(indio_dev); + int scale, scale2; + int schan_off = 0; s64 tmp, tmp2; u32 factor; int ret;@@ -99,6 +102,62 @@ static int rescale_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET: + /* + * Processed channels are scaled 1-to-1 and source offset is + * already taken into account. + * + * In other cases, the final offset value is defined by: + * offset = schan_offset + rescaler_offset / schan_scaleMaths is right, but perhaps useful to express how this is derived as I had to scribble it down to check. Want to express real world measurement as: scale * (raw + offset) Given we applying scale and offset recursively we have. rescaler_scale * (schan_scale * (raw + schan_offset) + rescaler_offset) which can be rearrange into the correct form at. rescaler_scale *schan_scale* (raw + (schan_offset + rescaler_offset/schan_scale)) Thus the scale and offset we expose to userspace should be. scale = rescaler_scale * schan_scale offset = schan_offset + rescaler_offset/schan_scale;
Understood, I'll update the comment with more details.
quoted
+ */ + if (rescale->chan_processed) { + *val = rescale->offset; + return IIO_VAL_INT; + } + + if (iio_channel_has_info(rescale->source->channel, + IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET)) { + ret = iio_read_channel_offset(rescale->source, + &schan_off, NULL); + if (ret < 0) + return ret;if you've returned in the first branch of the if, no need to worry about the else for checking the second condition. if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT) return...
Right, I'll combine both statements.
quoted
+ else if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + + ret = iio_read_channel_scale(rescale->source, &scale, &scale2); + switch (ret) { + case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL: + tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * scale2; + *val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off; + return IIO_VAL_INT; + case IIO_VAL_INT: + *val = div_s64(rescale->offset, scale) + schan_off; + return IIO_VAL_INT; + case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2: + tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * (1 << scale2); + *val = div_s64(tmp, scale) + schan_off; + return IIO_VAL_INT; + case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO: + tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000000UL; + tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000000UL) + scale2; + factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2); + tmp /= factor; + tmp2 /= factor;What is the benefit to doing gcd division before div_s64?
You're right the GCD division is unnecessary here, will drop.
quoted
+ *val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off; + return IIO_VAL_INT; + case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO: + tmp = (s64)rescale->offset * 1000000UL; + tmp2 = ((s64)scale * 1000000UL) + scale2; + factor = gcd(tmp, tmp2); + tmp /= factor; + tmp2 /= factor; + *val = div_s64(tmp, tmp2) + schan_off; + return IIO_VAL_INT; + default: + dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "unsupported type %d\n", ret); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } default: return -EINVAL; }@@ -175,6 +234,9 @@ static int rescale_configure_channel(struct device *dev, chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE); + if (rescale->offset) + chan->info_mask_separate |= BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET); + /* * Using .read_avail() is fringe to begin with and makes no sense * whatsoever for processed channels, so we make sure that this cannot@@ -339,6 +401,7 @@ static int rescale_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) rescale->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev); rescale->numerator = 1; rescale->denominator = 1; + rescale->offset = 0; ret = rescale->cfg->props(dev, rescale); if (ret)