Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: rn5t618: Add of compatibles for ADC and power
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Date: 2021-07-03 16:31:21
Also in:
linux-iio, linux-pm, lkml
Hi, On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 17:04:05 +0100 Jonathan Cameron [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 10:42:22 +0200 Andreas Kemnade [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This allows having devicetree nodes for the subdevices. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info> --- drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c index 384acb459427..b916c7471ca3 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c@@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ static const struct mfd_cell rn5t618_cells[] = { }; static const struct mfd_cell rc5t619_cells[] = { - { .name = "rn5t618-adc" }, - { .name = "rn5t618-power" }, + { .name = "rn5t618-adc", + .of_compatible = "ricoh,rc5t619-adc" },Odd to have a name of 618 and a compatible of 619. Why? Definitely deserves a comment if this is necessary for some reason!
Background of this whole thing: Both RN5T618 and RC5T619 have an ADC. I would expect the driver to work for both but I cannot prove that. No RN5T618 here to test. Maybe it requires some quirks, probably not. The only hint I have is that a) I use register definitions added to the kernel for RN5T618 support b) public datasheets looks same regarding the ADC. c) out-of-tree code for the RN5T618 does not give a clear picture, it shows no differences but is not complete enough to judge. To avoid introducing untested things, I am only adding it to the rc5t619_cell list. I would really hope that someone does some rn5t618 tests... Because everything else which is both for the RN5T618 and RC5T619 uses rn5t618 as a name, I continued that practise. The subdevice driver also gets the information whether it is a rn5t618 or rc5t619 via rn5t618->variant, so it can handle things.
quoted
+ { .name = "rn5t618-power", + .of_compatible = "ricoh,rc5t619-power" },
Similar situation here.
quoted
{ .name = "rn5t618-regulator" }, { .name = "rc5t619-rtc" },
and this one definitively only exists in the rc5t619.
quoted
{ .name = "rn5t618-wdt" },
Regards, Andreas