Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: ce4100: Replace "ti,pcf8575" by "nxp,pcf8575"

[PATCH v2 0/4] pcf857x: DTS fixes and DT binding to json-schema conversion · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> · 2021-06-01
[PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: dts: dra7x-evm: Drop "ti,pcf8575" · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> · 2021-06-01
Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: dts: dra7x-evm: Drop "ti,pcf8575" · Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> · 2021-06-11
[PATCH v2 3/4] x86: ce4100: Replace "ti,pcf8575" by "nxp,pcf8575" · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> · 2021-06-01
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: ce4100: Replace "ti,pcf8575" by "nxp,pcf8575" · Andy Shevchenko <hidden> · 2021-06-01
[PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: pcf857x: Convert to json-schema · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> · 2021-06-01
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: pcf857x: Convert to json-schema · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2021-06-04
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: pcf857x: Convert to json-schema · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2021-06-04
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: pcf857x: Convert to json-schema · Bartosz Golaszewski <hidden> · 2021-06-25
[PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: ce4100: Replace "ti,pcf8575" by "nxp,pcf8575" · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> · 2021-06-01
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: ce4100: Replace "ti,pcf8575" by "nxp,pcf8575" · Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> · 2021-06-04
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: ce4100: Replace "ti,pcf8575" by "nxp,pcf8575" · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2021-06-04
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: ce4100: Replace "ti,pcf8575" by "nxp,pcf8575" · Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> · 2021-06-20

From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-04 20:27:32
Also in: linux-gpio, linux-i2c, linux-omap, platform-driver-x86

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 05:25:44PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

The TI part is equivalent to the NXP part, and its compatible value is
not documented in the DT bindings.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

I'd think I pick this individually? Or shall it all go via some tree?

Attachments

signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help