Re: [v5 3/5] drm/panel-simple: Support for delays between GPIO & regulator
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date: 2021-06-03 00:06:11
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi, On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 8:57 AM Rajeev Nandan [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Some panels datasheets may specify a delay between the enable GPIO and the regulator. Support this in panel-simple. Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan <redacted> --- Changes in v4: - New Changes in v5: - Update description (Douglas) - Warn if "power_to_enable" or "disable_to_power_off" is non-zero and panel->enable_gpio is NULL (Douglas) drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c index 047fad5..e3f5b7e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c@@ -133,6 +133,22 @@ struct panel_desc { unsigned int prepare_to_enable; /** + * @delay.power_to_enable: Time for the power to enable the display on. + * + * The time (in milliseconds) to wait after powering up the display + * before asserting its enable pin. + */ + unsigned int power_to_enable; + + /** + * @delay.disable_to_power_off: Time for the disable to power the display off. + * + * The time (in milliseconds) to wait before powering off the display + * after deasserting its enable pin. + */ + unsigned int disable_to_power_off; + + /** * @delay.enable: Time for the panel to display a valid frame. * * The time (in milliseconds) that it takes for the panel to@@ -347,6 +363,10 @@ static int panel_simple_suspend(struct device *dev) struct panel_simple *p = dev_get_drvdata(dev); gpiod_set_value_cansleep(p->enable_gpio, 0); + + if (p->desc->delay.disable_to_power_off) + msleep(p->desc->delay.disable_to_power_off); + regulator_disable(p->supply); p->unprepared_time = ktime_get();@@ -407,6 +427,9 @@ static int panel_simple_prepare_once(struct panel_simple *p) return err; } + if (p->desc->delay.power_to_enable) + msleep(p->desc->delay.power_to_enable); + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(p->enable_gpio, 1); delay = p->desc->delay.prepare;@@ -782,6 +805,11 @@ static int panel_simple_probe(struct device *dev, const struct panel_desc *desc, break; } + if (!panel->enable_gpio && desc->delay.disable_to_power_off) + dev_warn(dev, "Specify enable_gpio when using disable_to_power_off delay\n"); + if (!panel->enable_gpio && desc->delay.power_to_enable) + dev_warn(dev, "Specify enable_gpio when using power_to_enable delay\n");
Last nit is that the warning messages could be a little confusing to someone reading the logs. I guess the target audience of the error message is probably someone doing bringup. That person specified a panel in their device tree and maybe isn't even aware that they're using "disable_to_power_off" or "power_to_enable". Maybe wording instead: Need a delay after disabling panel GPIO, but a GPIO wasn't provided. Need a delay after enabling panel GPIO, but a GPIO wasn't provided. That's definitely getting into nittiness, though and I wouldn't be upset if the patch landed with the existing messages. Thus, with or without the change to the error message: Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>