Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] watchdog: mtk_wdt: Refactor code to support more SoCs
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: 2021-05-10 13:30:40
Also in:
linux-mediatek
On 5/9/21 2:17 PM, Boris Lysov wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch makes some constants SoC-dependent to support more watchdogs in the future. It adds shifts of WDT_MODE_KEY and SWSYSRST_KEY to mtk_wdt_data struct. This is done to bring support for various Mediatek watchdogs which use same register structure but slightly different field offsets in the UNLOCK_KEY registers. For example, mt6577 watchdog has WDT_MODE_KEY and SWSYSRST_KEY at [15:8] instead of currently (and only) supported [31:24]. Moreover, this patch adds SWSYSRST_KEY value to mtk_wdt_data because this value also depends on specific SoC watchdog, for example mt6577 uses 0x15 instead of 0x88. Signed-off-by: Boris Lysov <redacted> --- drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c index 97ca993bd009..9d3091b12c06 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c +++ b/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c@@ -44,13 +44,27 @@ #define WDT_MODE_IRQ_EN (1 << 3) #define WDT_MODE_AUTO_START (1 << 4) #define WDT_MODE_DUAL_EN (1 << 6) -#define WDT_MODE_KEY 0x22000000 +#define WDT_MODE_KEY 0x22 #define WDT_SWRST 0x14 #define WDT_SWRST_KEY 0x1209 - #define WDT_SWSYSRST 0x18U -#define WDT_SWSYS_RST_KEY 0x88000000 + +#define MT2712_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT2712_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT2712_SWSYSRST_KEY 0x88 + +#define MT6589_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT6589_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT6589_SWSYSRST_KEY 0x88 + +#define MT8183_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT8183_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT8183_SWSYSRST_KEY 0x88 + +#define MT8192_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT8192_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT 24 // unlock_key [31:24] +#define MT8192_SWSYSRST_KEY 0x88 #define DRV_NAME "mtk-wdt" #define DRV_VERSION "1.0"@@ -60,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned int timeout; struct mtk_wdt_dev { struct watchdog_device wdt_dev; + const struct mtk_wdt_data *data; void __iomem *wdt_base; spinlock_t lock; /* protects WDT_SWSYSRST reg */ struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;@@ -67,18 +82,37 @@ struct mtk_wdt_dev { struct mtk_wdt_data { int toprgu_sw_rst_num; + u8 wdt_mode_key_shift; + u8 wdt_swsys_rst_key; + u8 wdt_swsys_rst_key_shift; }; static const struct mtk_wdt_data mt2712_data = { - .toprgu_sw_rst_num = MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM, + .toprgu_sw_rst_num = MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM, + .wdt_mode_key_shift = MT2712_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key_shift = MT2712_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key = MT2712_SWSYSRST_KEY, +}; + +static const struct mtk_wdt_data mt6589_data = { + .toprgu_sw_rst_num = -1, + .wdt_mode_key_shift = MT6589_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key_shift = MT6589_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key = MT6589_SWSYSRST_KEY, }; static const struct mtk_wdt_data mt8183_data = { - .toprgu_sw_rst_num = MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM, + .toprgu_sw_rst_num = MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM, + .wdt_mode_key_shift = MT8183_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key_shift = MT8183_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key = MT8183_SWSYSRST_KEY, }; static const struct mtk_wdt_data mt8192_data = { - .toprgu_sw_rst_num = MT8192_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM, + .toprgu_sw_rst_num = MT8192_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM, + .wdt_mode_key_shift = MT8192_WDT_MODE_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key_shift = MT8192_SWSYSRST_KEY_SHIFT, + .wdt_swsys_rst_key = MT8192_SWSYSRST_KEY, }; static int toprgu_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,@@ -86,20 +120,20 @@ static int toprgu_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, { unsigned int tmp; unsigned long flags; - struct mtk_wdt_dev *data = + struct mtk_wdt_dev *wdev =
Please do not rename variables. If you dislike that the name matches the name of the newly introduced structure element, find a different name for that. Thanks, Guenter