Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 4 authors, 2021-05-11

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: Add devicetree binding for IDT 79RC32434 GPIO controller

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-01 12:13:50
Also in: linux-gpio, lkml

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:54 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
[off-list ref] wrote:
Add YAML devicetree binding for IDT 79RC32434 GPIO controller

Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
---
Changes in v4:
 - renamed to idt,32434-gpio this time for real
Overall looks good to me.
+required:
(...)
+  - ngpios
Is there a *technical* reason why this is required?

Can't the driver just default to 32 gpios when not specified?
+  - interrupt-controller
+  - "#interrupt-cells"
+  - interrupts
Why can't interrupt support be made optional?

It is fine if the driver errors out if not provided, but
for the bindings this feels optional.

Or does the thing break unless you handle the IRQs?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help