Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: blacklist SC7280 in cpufreq-dt-platdev
From: Sibi Sankar <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-20 07:20:50
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
From: Sibi Sankar <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-20 07:20:50
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
On 2021-05-20 09:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 12-05-21, 13:41, Sibi Sankar wrote:quoted
Add SC7280 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blacklist since the actual scaling is handled by the 'qcom-cpufreq-hw' driver. Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <redacted> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.cb/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c index 5e07065ec22f..345418b8250e 100644--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blacklist[]__initconst = { { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996", }, { .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", }, { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", }, + { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", }, { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845", }, { .compatible = "st,stih407", },Applied 1/2. Thanks. What do you want to do for 2/2 ? Go through my tree? need an update ?
Lets skip pulling in 2/2 for now. It depends on a few other changes to land first and the cpufreq node for sc7280 needs a re-spin. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.