Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add binding for TI TCAN104x CAN transceivers
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-04-13 07:41:34
Also in:
linux-can, linux-phy, lkml, netdev
On 12.04.2021 12:49:56, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:19:30PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:quoted
On 4/9/21 3:40 PM, Aswath Govindraju wrote:quoted
Add binding documentation for TI TCAN104x CAN transceivers. Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <redacted> --- .../bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 56 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yamldiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4abfc30a97d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml#" +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#" + +title: TCAN104x CAN TRANSCEIVER PHY + +maintainers: + - Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com> + +properties: + $nodename: + pattern: "^tcan104x-phy" + + compatible: + enum: + - ti,tcan1042 + - ti,tcan1043Can you create a generic standby only and a generic standby and enable transceiver?As a fallback compatible fine, but no generic binding please. A generic binding can't describe any timing requirements between the 2 GPIO as well as supplies when someone wants to add those (and they will).
Right - that makes sense.
quoted
quoted
+ + '#phy-cells': + const: 0 + + standby-gpios: + description: + gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver + maxItems: 1 + + enable-gpios: + description: + gpio node to toggle enable signal on transceiver + maxItems: 1 + + max-bitrate: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + description: + max bit rate supported in bpsWe already have 'max-speed' for serial devices, use that.
There is already the neither Ethernet PHY (PHYLINK/PHYLIB) nor generic PHY (GENERIC_PHY) can-transceiver binding Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.yaml which specifies max-bitrate. I don't have strong feelings whether to use max-bitrate or max-speed. Speaking about Ethernet PHYs, what are to pros and cons to use the generic PHY compared to the Ethernet PHY infrastructure? regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 488 bytes