Thread (10 messages) read the whole thread 10 messages, 2 authors, 2021-03-25

Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] phy: Add LVDS configuration options

From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-25 07:29:42
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On 18-03-21, 10:22, Liu Ying wrote:
quoted
Can we have these in kernel-doc style please, similar to style in linux/phy/phy.h
I take this way of in-line member documentation comment for the below 3
reasons:

1) Members of struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy and
struct phy_configure_opts_dp use the same way of comment.
The structures are defined in linux/phy/phy-mipi-dphy.h and
linux/phy/phy-dp.h respectively.
Aligning to them makes a bit sense, IMHO.

2) In-line member documentation comments[1] are mentioned in kernel-doc 
guide. It says 'The structure members may also be documented in-line
within the definition.'.

3) Even the 'configure' and 'validate' members of struct phy_ops use
the same way of comment.  struct phy_ops is defined in linux/phy/phy.h.

[1] 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#in-line-member-documentation-comments
It 'may be' but I would like all headers of a subsystem to display one
style. As I said linux/phy/phy.h use a style which we should use
everywhere.

Thanks

-- 
~Vinod
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help