Am Montag, 15. Februar 2021, 15:33:19 CET schrieb Helen Koike:
quoted
From: Heiko Stuebner <redacted>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Kconfig
index cb25c0e8fc9b..3094d4533ad6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ config DRM_ROCKCHIP
select DRM_ANALOGIX_DP if ROCKCHIP_ANALOGIX_DP
select DRM_DW_HDMI if ROCKCHIP_DW_HDMI
select DRM_DW_MIPI_DSI if ROCKCHIP_DW_MIPI_DSI
+ select GENERIC_PHY if ROCKCHIP_DW_MIPI_DSI
+ select GENERIC_PHY_MIPI_DPHY if ROCKCHIP_DW_MIPI_DSI
maybe alphabetical order?
ok
quoted
+static int dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ struct dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip *dsi = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+ int i, ret;
It seems "i" could be removed, use ret instead.
I don't think so
I.e. the driver does
i = max_mbps_to_parameter(...)
...
ret = power-on-clocks-and-stuff
...
dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(.... dppa_map[i].hsfreqrange)
So will need to keep the param index separate.
In general, the patch doesn't look wrong to me.
For the whole serie:
Acked-by: Helen Koike <redacted>
Thanks a lot :-)
Heiko