Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties

[PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2021-03-16
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Dmitry Baryshkov <hidden> · 2021-03-16
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Alex Elder <hidden> · 2021-03-16
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2021-03-16
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Suman Anna <hidden> · 2021-03-16
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2021-03-17
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> · 2021-03-17
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden> · 2021-03-17
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Maxime Ripard <hidden> · 2021-03-17
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> · 2021-03-17
Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Drop type references on common properties · Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden> · 2021-03-18

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-16 20:51:42
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-can, linux-gpio, linux-pm, linux-remoteproc, linux-usb, lkml, netdev

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:48:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

Users of common properties shouldn't have a type definition as the
common schemas already have one. Drop all the unnecessary type
references in the tree.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Attachments

signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 488 bytes

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help