Hello Nicolas,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 01:32:44PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-raspberrypi-poe.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-raspberrypi-poe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ca845e8fabe6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-raspberrypi-poe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright 2020 Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
+ * For more information on Raspberry Pi's PoE hat see:
+ * https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/poe-hat/
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - No disable bit, so a disabled PWM is simulated by duty_cycle 0
+ * - Only normal polarity
+ * - Fixed 12.5 kHz period
+ *
+ * The current period is completed when HW is reconfigured.
nice.
+ */
+
[...]
+static int raspberrypi_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ struct raspberrypi_pwm *rpipwm = raspberrypi_pwm_from_chip(chip);
+ unsigned int duty_cycle;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (state->period < RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS ||
+ state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!state->enabled)
+ duty_cycle = 0;
+ else if (state->duty_cycle < RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS)
+ duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_DOWN_ULL(state->duty_cycle * RPI_PWM_MAX_DUTY,
+ RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS);
+ else
+ duty_cycle = RPI_PWM_MAX_DUTY;
+
+ if (duty_cycle == rpipwm->duty_cycle)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = raspberrypi_pwm_set_property(rpipwm->firmware, RPI_PWM_CUR_DUTY_REG,
+ duty_cycle);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to set duty cycle: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This sets the default duty cycle after resetting the board, we
+ * updated it every time to mimic Raspberry Pi's downstream's driver
+ * behaviour.
+ */
+ ret = raspberrypi_pwm_set_property(rpipwm->firmware, RPI_PWM_DEF_DUTY_REG,
+ duty_cycle);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to set default duty cycle: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
+ return ret;
This only has an effect for the next reboot, right? If so I wonder if it
is a good idea in general. (Think: The current PWM setting enables a
motor that makes a self-driving car move at 100 km/h. Consider the rpi
crashes, do I want to car to pick up driving 100 km/h at power up even
before Linux is up again?) And if we agree it's a good idea: Should
raspberrypi_pwm_apply return 0 if setting the duty cycle succeeded and
only setting the default didn't?
Other than that the patch looks fine.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |