[PATCH v2 0/3] Implement nvmem support for mtd · Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> · 2021-02-16
[PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: partitions: ofpart: skip subnodes parse with compatible · Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> · 2021-02-16
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: partitions: ofpart: skip subnodes parse with compatible · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2021-03-02
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: partitions: ofpart: skip subnodes parse with compatible · Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> · 2021-03-02
[PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: core: add nvmem-partitions compatible to parse mtd as nvmem cells · Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> · 2021-02-16
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: core: add nvmem-partitions compatible to parse mtd as nvmem cells · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2021-03-03
[PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> · 2021-02-16
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2021-03-03
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2021-03-05
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible · Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> · 2021-03-08

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Document use of nvmem-partitions compatible

From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-03-08 09:49:15
Also in: lkml

On 16.02.2021 22:26, Ansuel Smith wrote:

Document nvmem-partitions compatible used to treat mtd partitions as a
nvmem provider.

I'm just wondering if "nvmem-partitions" is accurate enough. Partitions
bit sounds a bit ambiguous in the mtd context.

What do you think about "mtd-nvmem-cells" or just "nvmem-cells"?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help