RE: [PATCH V3 4/5] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: add clock bindings
From: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-03-05 14:10:54
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-mmc, lkml
Hi Rob,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Peng Fan (OSS) <redacted> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:10 AM From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> Add clock bindings for fsl-imx-esdhc yaml Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yamlb/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml index a7fbd8cc1e38..369471814496 100644--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml@@ -103,6 +103,17 @@ properties: Only eMMC HS400 mode need to take care of this property. default: 0 + clocks: + maxItems: 3 + description: + Handle clocks for the sdhc controller. + + clock-names: + items: + - const: ipg + - const: ahb + - const: per
One question: The side effect of this patch is that it imposes a forced order of clk names In DT which actually was not needed. Do we really have to do that? Or any other better approach to allow a random order to match the DT usage better? Regards Aisheng
+
pinctrl-names:
minItems: 1
maxItems: 4
--
2.30.0