Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cmdline: Add generic function to build command line.
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-05 12:50:17
Also in:
linux-arch, linuxppc-dev, lkml
Le 05/03/2021 à 12:58, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Will Deacon [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:57:09PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
Le 03/03/2021 à 18:46, Will Deacon a écrit :quoted
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
Le 03/03/2021 à 18:28, Will Deacon a écrit :quoted
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:25:17PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
This code provides architectures with a way to build command line based on what is built in the kernel and what is handed over by the bootloader, based on selected compile-time options. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted> --- include/linux/cmdline.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/linux/cmdline.hdiff --git a/include/linux/cmdline.h b/include/linux/cmdline.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ae3610bb0ee2 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/cmdline.h@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _LINUX_CMDLINE_H +#define _LINUX_CMDLINE_H + +static __always_inline size_t cmdline_strlen(const char *s) +{ + const char *sc; + + for (sc = s; *sc != '\0'; ++sc) + ; /* nothing */ + return sc - s; +} + +static __always_inline size_t cmdline_strlcat(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count) +{ + size_t dsize = cmdline_strlen(dest); + size_t len = cmdline_strlen(src); + size_t res = dsize + len; + + /* This would be a bug */ + if (dsize >= count) + return count; + + dest += dsize; + count -= dsize; + if (len >= count) + len = count - 1; + memcpy(dest, src, len); + dest[len] = 0; + return res; +}Why are these needed instead of using strlen and strlcat directly?Because on powerpc (at least), it will be used in prom_init, it is very early in the boot and KASAN shadow memory is not set up yet so calling generic string functions would crash the board.Hmm. We deliberately setup a _really_ early shadow on arm64 for this, can you not do something similar? Failing that, I think it would be better to offer the option for an arch to implement cmdline_*, but have then point to the normal library routines by default.I don't think it is possible to setup an earlier early shadow. At the point we are in prom_init, the code is not yet relocated at the address it was linked for, and it is running with the MMU set by the bootloader, I can't imagine being able to setup MMU entries for the early shadow KASAN yet without breaking everything.That's very similar to us; we're not relocated, although we are at least in control of the MMU (which is using a temporary set of page-tables).prom_init runs as an OF client, with the MMU off (except on some Apple machines), and we don't own the MMU. So there's really nothing we can do :) Though now that I look at it, I don't think we should be doing this level of commandline handling in prom_init. It should just grab the value from firmware and pass it to the kernel proper, and then all the prepend/append/force etc. logic should happen there.
But then, how do you handle the command line parameters that are needed by prom_init ? For instance, prom_init_mem() use 'prom_memory_limit', which comes from the "mem=" option in the command line. Christophe