Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/tegra: Add NVDEC driver
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: 2021-02-16 15:17:10
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-tegra
On 13/02/2021 10:15, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
Add support for booting and using NVDEC on Tegra210, Tegra186 and Tegra194 to the Host1x and TegraDRM drivers. Booting in secure mode is not currently supported. Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/Makefile | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 4 + drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/nvdec.c | 497 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/host1x/dev.c | 12 + include/linux/host1x.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 517 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/nvdec.c
...
+static int nvdec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct host1x_syncpt **syncpts;
+ struct resource *regs;
+ struct nvdec *nvdec;
+ int err;
+
+ /* inherit DMA mask from host1x parent */
+ err = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, *dev->parent->dma_mask);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to set DMA mask: %d\n", err);
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ nvdec = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nvdec), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!nvdec)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ nvdec->config = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+
+ syncpts = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*syncpts), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!syncpts)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ if (!regs) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get registers\n");
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ nvdec->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, regs);
+ if (IS_ERR(nvdec->regs))
+ return PTR_ERR(nvdec->regs);
+We should be able to use devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() here.
+ nvdec->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(nvdec->clk)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(nvdec->clk);
+ }
+
+ if (!dev->pm_domain) {Looks like the power-domain is required by device-tree and so do we need this?
+ nvdec->rst = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "nvdec");
+ if (IS_ERR(nvdec->rst)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get reset\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(nvdec->rst);
+ }
+ }
+
+ nvdec->falcon.dev = dev;
+ nvdec->falcon.regs = nvdec->regs;
+
+ err = falcon_init(&nvdec->falcon);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nvdec);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvdec->client.base.list);
+ nvdec->client.base.ops = &nvdec_client_ops;
+ nvdec->client.base.dev = dev;
+ nvdec->client.base.class = HOST1X_CLASS_NVDEC;
+ nvdec->client.base.syncpts = syncpts;
+ nvdec->client.base.num_syncpts = 1;
+ nvdec->dev = dev;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvdec->client.list);
+ nvdec->client.version = nvdec->config->version;
+ nvdec->client.ops = &nvdec_ops;
+
+ err = host1x_client_register(&nvdec->client.base);
+ if (err < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to register host1x client: %d\n", err);
+ goto exit_falcon;
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev)) {
+ err = nvdec_runtime_resume(&pdev->dev);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto unregister_client;
+ }pm_runtime should always be enabled for 64-bit Tegra and so we should not need to check pm_runtime_enabled(). Cheers Jon -- nvpublic