Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Document ROHM BR24G01
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-02-09 14:17:39
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-renesas-soc
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-02-09 14:17:39
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-renesas-soc
Hi Bartosz, On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:33 AM Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus EEPROM.What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm handling somewhen)?Good question. The datasheets look similar. Parametric search on rohm.com says the G-series differs in using "Cu wire bonding".I'm fine with the current form as it's simpler than using two fallbacks. Do you want to submit another version anyway or can I pick it up?
If you're happy with it, then I'm happy, too ;-)
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds