Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 6 authors, 2021-01-26

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由robherring2@gmail.com代发】

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-26 14:50:09
Also in: linux-pci

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:44 PM xxm [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Rob,

Thanks for reply.

在 2021/1/25 23:26, Rob Herring 写道:
quoted
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:48:24AM +0800, Simon Xue wrote:
quoted
Document DT bindings for PCIe controller found on Rockchip SoC.

Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <redacted>
---
  .../bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml        | 133 ++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 133 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..24ea42203c14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: DesignWare based PCIe RC controller on Rockchip SoCs
+
+maintainers:
+  - Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
+  - Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
+  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
+
+description: |+
+  RK3568 SoC PCIe host controller is based on the Synopsys DesignWare
+  PCIe IP and thus inherits all the common properties defined in
+  designware-pcie.txt.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml#
+
+# We need a select here so we don't match all nodes with 'snps,dw-pcie'
+select:
+  properties:
+    compatible:
+      contains:
+        const: rockchip,rk3568-pcie
+  required:
+    - compatible
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - const: rockchip,rk3568-pcie
+      - const: snps,dw-pcie
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: Data Bus Interface (DBI) registers
+      - description: Rockchip designed configuration registers
+
+  clocks:
+    items:
+      - description: AHB clock for PCIe master
+      - description: AHB clock for PCIe slave
+      - description: AHB clock for PCIe dbi
+      - description: APB clock for PCIe
+      - description: Auxiliary clock for PCIe
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: aclk_mst
+      - const: aclk_slv
+      - const: aclk_dbi
+      - const: pclk
+      - const: aux
+
+  msi-map: true
+
+  num-lanes: true
+
+  phys:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  phy-names:
+    const: pcie-phy
+
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  ranges:
+    maxItems: 3
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  reset-names:
+    const: pipe
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+  - msi-map
+  - num-lanes
+  - phys
+  - phy-names
+  - power-domains
+  - resets
+  - reset-names
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+
+    bus {
+        #address-cells = <2>;
+        #size-cells = <2>;
+
+        pcie3x2: pcie@fe280000 {
+            compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
+            reg = <0x3 0xc0800000 0x0 0x400000>,
+                  <0x0 0xfe280000 0x0 0x10000>;
+            reg-names = "pcie-dbi", "pcie-apb";
I believe I already said use 'dbi'. The DBI is also not 4MB. The config
space goes here too, not in 'ranges'.
Sorry for missing  update in yaml.

I think yaml is used to describe the resources of specific SoC, it
reserves 4MB for DBI on Rockchip SoC.

So, I think assign 4MB here is reasonable.
Not if there's nothing there. Otherwise you are wasting almost 4MB of
virtual space. Doesn't matter so much on 64-bit, but for 32-bit it
really does.

Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help