Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 6 authors, 2021-02-09

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: Add support for AM642 SoC

From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Date: 2021-01-21 20:15:24
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On 13:57-20210121, Suman Anna wrote:
This is all moot when your own tree doesn't boot properly. In this case, you are
adding MMC nodes, but yet for a boot test, you are saying use linux-next for the
nodes that were added or you need additional driver patches (which is not how
maintainer-level trees are verified).
Get your facts straight please.

What do you mean does'nt boot? It does boot with initramfs which is
the minimum qual i had set for any new platform (along with. - your
need is for a device node to work - which is both a combination of
defconfig + driver updates.
Arnd,
Can you please guide us here as to what is expected in general, given that the
pull-request from Nishanth goes through you, and if there is some pre-existing
norms around this?

Tony,
Appreciate your input as well since you probably have dealt with these kinda of
dependencies on OMAP.

I am more than happy to drop this entire SoC off my queue (I am yet to
pick it up), which is probably what I will do.


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help