Hello Nicolas,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 05:48:00PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:

I'd like to see this function use the same prefix as the other
functions. I suggest "raspberrypi_pwm_from_chip".

+{
+	return container_of(chip, struct raspberrypi_pwm, chip);
+}
+
+static int raspberrypi_pwm_set_property(struct rpi_firmware *firmware,
+					u32 reg, u32 val)
+{
+	struct raspberrypi_pwm_prop msg = {
+		.reg = cpu_to_le32(reg),
+		.val = cpu_to_le32(val),
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(firmware, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_POE_HAT_VAL,
+				    &msg, sizeof(msg));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	if (msg.ret)
+		return -EIO;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int raspberrypi_pwm_get_property(struct rpi_firmware *firmware,
+					u32 reg, u32 *val)
+{
+	struct raspberrypi_pwm_prop msg = {
+		.reg = reg
+	};
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = rpi_firmware_property(firmware, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_POE_HAT_VAL,
+				    &msg, sizeof(msg));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	if (msg.ret)
+		return -EIO;
+
+	*val = le32_to_cpu(msg.val);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void raspberrypi_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+				      struct pwm_device *pwm,
+				      struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct raspberrypi_pwm *rpipwm = to_raspberrypi_pwm(chip);
+
+	state->period = RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS;
+	state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rpipwm->duty_cycle * RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS,
+					      RPI_PWM_MAX_DUTY);

Please round up here ...

+	state->enabled = !!(rpipwm->duty_cycle);
+	state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+}
+
+static int raspberrypi_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			         const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct raspberrypi_pwm *rpipwm = to_raspberrypi_pwm(chip);
+	unsigned int duty_cycle;
+	int ret;
+
+        if (state->period < RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS ||
+            state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
+                return -EINVAL;
+
+        if (!state->enabled)
+                duty_cycle = 0;
+        else if (state->duty_cycle < RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS)
+                duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(state->duty_cycle * RPI_PWM_MAX_DUTY,
+					           RPI_PWM_PERIOD_NS);

... and round down here.

Just to be sure: writing RPI_PWM_MAX_DUTY (i.e. 255) yields 100% duty
cycle, right?

+        else
+                duty_cycle = RPI_PWM_MAX_DUTY;
+
+	if (duty_cycle == rpipwm->duty_cycle)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = raspberrypi_pwm_set_property(rpipwm->firmware, RPI_PWM_CUR_DUTY_REG,
+					   duty_cycle);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to set duty cycle: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * This sets the default duty cycle after resetting the board, we
+	 * updated it every time to mimic Raspberry Pi's downstream's driver
+	 * behaviour.
+	 */
+	ret = raspberrypi_pwm_set_property(rpipwm->firmware, RPI_PWM_DEF_DUTY_REG,
+					   duty_cycle);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to set default duty cycle: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+        rpipwm->duty_cycle = duty_cycle;

Please use tabs for indention. (The general hint is to use checkpatch
which (I hope) tells you about problems like this.)

+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops raspberrypi_pwm_ops = {
+	.get_state = raspberrypi_pwm_get_state,
+	.apply = raspberrypi_pwm_apply,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int raspberrypi_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device_node *firmware_node;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct rpi_firmware *firmware;
+	struct raspberrypi_pwm *rpipwm;
+	int ret;
+
+	firmware_node = of_get_parent(dev->of_node);
+	if (!firmware_node) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n");
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
+	firmware = devm_rpi_firmware_get(&pdev->dev, firmware_node);
+	of_node_put(firmware_node);
+	if (!firmware)
+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;

Please use dev_err_probe to benefit from recording an error message in
this case.

+	rpipwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rpipwm), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rpipwm)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	rpipwm->firmware = firmware;
+	rpipwm->chip.dev = dev;
+	rpipwm->chip.ops = &raspberrypi_pwm_ops;
+	rpipwm->chip.base = -1;
+	rpipwm->chip.npwm = RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE_PWM_NUM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rpipwm);
+
+	ret = raspberrypi_pwm_get_property(rpipwm->firmware, RPI_PWM_CUR_DUTY_REG,
+					   &rpipwm->duty_cycle);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get duty cycle: %d\n", ret);

Please use %pe for the error codes (directly or still better by using
dev_err_probe here, too).

+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return pwmchip_add(&rpipwm->chip);
+}
[...]

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |