Thread (56 messages) 56 messages, 12 authors, 2023-01-05

Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature

From: Saravana Kannan <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-11 19:58:23
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-efi, linux-next, lkml

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:03 AM Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On 2020-12-11 17:51, Saravana Kannan wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 8:34 AM Robin Murphy [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
On 2020-12-11 14:11, Qian Cai wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 18:02 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
quoted
The current implementation of fw_devlink is very inefficient because it
tries to get away without creating fwnode links in the name of saving
memory usage. Past attempts to optimize runtime at the cost of memory
usage were blocked with request for data showing that the optimization
made significant improvement for real world scenarios.

We have those scenarios now. There have been several reports of boot
time increase in the order of seconds in this thread [1]. Several OEMs
and SoC manufacturers have also privately reported significant
(350-400ms) increase in boot time due to all the parsing done by
fw_devlink.

So this patch uses all the setup done by the previous patches in this
series to refactor fw_devlink to be more efficient. Most of the code has
been moved out of firmware specific (DT mostly) code into driver core.

This brings the following benefits:
- Instead of parsing the device tree multiple times during bootup,
   fw_devlink parses each fwnode node/property only once and creates
   fwnode links. The rest of the fw_devlink code then just looks at these
   fwnode links to do rest of the work.

- Makes it much easier to debug probe issue due to fw_devlink in the
   future. fw_devlink=on blocks the probing of devices if they depend on
   a device that hasn't been added yet. With this refactor, it'll be very
   easy to tell what that device is because we now have a reference to
   the fwnode of the device.

- Much easier to add fw_devlink support to ACPI and other firmware
   types. A refactor to move the common bits from DT specific code to
   driver core was in my TODO list as a prerequisite to adding ACPI
   support to fw_devlink. This series gets that done.

[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/ea02f57e-871d-cd16-4418-c1da4bbc4696@ti.com/ (local)
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <redacted>
Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Reverting this commit and its dependency:

2d09e6eb4a6f driver core: Delete pointless parameter in fwnode_operations.add_links

from today's linux-next fixed a boot crash on an arm64 Thunder X2 server.
Since the call stack implicates the platform-device-wrangling we do in
IORT code I took a quick look; AFAICS my guess would be it's blowing
up
trying to walk a zeroed list head since "driver core: Add
fwnode_init()"
missed acpi_alloc_fwnode_static().
Thanks Robin. I'm pretty sure this is the reason. I thought I fixed
all ACPI cases, but clearly I missed this one. I'll send out a patch
for this today. If you think there are any other places I missed
please let me know. I'll try some git grep foo to see if I missed any
other instances of fwnode ops being set.
Yup, that fixed it here (QDF2400).

Thanks,

         M.
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 39263c6b52e1..2630c2e953f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static inline struct fwnode_handle
*acpi_alloc_fwnode_static(void)
        if (!fwnode)
                return NULL;

-       fwnode->ops = &acpi_static_fwnode_ops;
+       fwnode_init(fwnode, &acpi_static_fwnode_ops);

        return fwnode;
  }
Lol, my only contribution to the patch will be the commit text. I'll
send them with reported-by, suggested-by and tested-by if no one less
beats me to it.

-Saravana
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help