On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 03:28:29PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Since the CSI controller binding is getting a bit more complex due
to the addition of MIPI CSI-2 bridge support, make the ports node
explicit with the parallel port.
This way, it's clear that the controller only supports parallel
interface input and there's no confusion about the port number.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
index 9be13378d4df..02b698cace6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi
@@ -803,6 +803,15 @@ csi: camera@1cb0000 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&csi_pins>;
status = "disabled";
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ csi_in_parallel: port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ };
+ };
};
This will create a DTC warning, since port@0 is the only node, and is
equivalent to port
Maxime