Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for CPUFREQ HW
From: Hector Yuan <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-19 13:40:53
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-pm, lkml
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 12:41 +0000, Lukasz Luba wrote:
Hi Hector, On 10/26/20 8:19 AM, Hector Yuan wrote:quoted
From: "Hector.Yuan" <redacted> Add cpufreq HW support. Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <redacted>[snip]quoted
+ +static int mtk_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + struct cpufreq_mtk *c; + struct device *cpu_dev; + struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power); + struct pm_qos_request *qos_request; + int sig, pwr_hw = CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS | SVS_HW_STATUS; + + qos_request = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos_request), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!qos_request) + return -ENOMEM; + + cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu); + if (!cpu_dev) { + pr_err("failed to get cpu%d device\n", policy->cpu); + return -ENODEV; + } + + c = mtk_freq_domain_map[policy->cpu]; + if (!c) { + pr_err("No scaling support for CPU%d\n", policy->cpu); + return -ENODEV; + } + + cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &c->related_cpus); + + policy->freq_table = c->table; + policy->driver_data = c;To control frequency transition rate in schedutil, you might be interested in setting: policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = <mtk_value_here>; Example, when this latency value comes from FW [1]
OK, I will add it in v9.
quoted
+ + /* Let CPUs leave idle-off state for SVS CPU initializing */ + cpu_latency_qos_add_request(qos_request, 0); + + /* HW should be in enabled state to proceed now */ + writel_relaxed(0x1, c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_ENABLE]); + + if (readl_poll_timeout(c->reg_bases[REG_FREQ_HW_STATE], sig, + (sig & pwr_hw) == pwr_hw, POLL_USEC, + TIMEOUT_USEC)) { + if (!(sig & CPUFREQ_HW_STATUS)) { + pr_info("cpufreq hardware of CPU%d is not enabled\n", + policy->cpu); + return -ENODEV; + } + + pr_info("SVS of CPU%d is not enabled\n", policy->cpu); + } + + em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, c->nr_opp, &em_cb, policy->cpus);Please keep in mind that this is going to be changed soon with a new argument: 'milliwatts'. It's queued in pm/linux-next [2].
OK, thanks for the remind.
Regards, Lukasz [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c#L194 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=c250d50fe2ce627ca9805d9c8ac11cbbf922a4a6