Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 4 authors, 2020-11-17

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip,ksz: add interrupt property

From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
Date: 2020-11-13 18:58:21
Also in: lkml, netdev

On Friday, 13 November 2020, 00:07:32 CET, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:35:31PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
quoted
The devices have an optional interrupt line.

Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
---

 .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml        | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml index
431ca5c498a8..b2613d6c97cf 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
...
quoted
+            interrupt-parent = <&gpio5>;
+            interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;  /* INTRP_N line */
Isn't it preferable to use this syntax?

		interrupts-extended = <&gpio5 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;  /* INTRP_N line */
After reading Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt,
I would say that "interrupts-extended" is more flexible as it allows different
interrupt parents for the case there is more than one interrupt line. Although
there is only one line on the KSZ, I will change this.


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help